WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L
WCOM.L (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and SLVR.L (WisdomTree Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - WCOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Optimized Roll Commodity (GBP Hedged), while SLVR.L is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCOM.L returned 11.21%/yr vs 20.37%/yr for SLVR.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCOM.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SLVR.L.
Performance
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WCOM.L is traded in GBp, while SLVR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOM.L achieves a 33.12% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR.L's 3.56% return.
WCOM.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 33.12%
- 6M
- 34.26%
- 1Y
- 45.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR.L
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 23.51%
- 1Y
- 109.63%
- 3Y*
- 39.33%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOM.L WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 33.12% | 15.31% | 2.49% | -7.76% | 11.71% | 25.55% | -0.57% | 4.18% | -6.00% |
SLVR.L WisdomTree Silver | 3.56% | 119.85% | 22.25% | -7.44% | 14.41% | -13.86% | 36.48% | 9.63% | 4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOM.L and SLVR.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2018 | 0.39 |
The correlation between WCOM.L and SLVR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L — Risk / Return Rank
WCOM.L
SLVR.L
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCOM.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.34 | 2.81 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.12 | 6.18 | +12.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCOM.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.90 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.29 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, smaller than the maximum SLVR.L drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOM.L and SLVR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOM.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.58% | -72.07% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.13% | -38.77% | +32.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.58% | -38.77% | +29.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.41% | -38.77% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -34.02% | +31.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -43.49% | +31.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 17.67% | -15.31% |
Volatility
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) is 5.33%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that WCOM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCOM.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 17.31% | -11.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 54.93% | -40.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 57.52% | -41.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 35.18% | -19.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 31.10% | -17.18% |
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCOM.L vs. SLVR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOM.L nor SLVR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCOM.L and SLVR.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WCOM.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SLVR.L.
WCOM.L is categorized as Commodities, while SLVR.L is Silver. WCOM.L tracks Optimized Roll Commodity (GBP Hedged), while SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WCOM.L and 0.49% for SLVR.L.
Find the right allocation for WCOM.L and SLVR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer