WCOM.L vs. INTL.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WCOM.L (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - WCOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Optimized Roll Commodity (GBP Hedged), while INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCOM.L returned 11.21%/yr vs 17.40%/yr for INTL.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCOM.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.

Performance

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOM.L achieves a 33.12% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 50.10% return.

WCOM.L

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 33.12%
• 6M: 34.26%
• 1Y: 45.20%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: —

INTL.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 25.51%
• YTD: 50.10%
• 6M: 51.64%
• 1Y: 96.68%
• 3Y*: 31.07%
• 5Y*: 17.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WCOM.L WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	33.12%	15.31%	2.49%	-7.76%	11.71%	25.55%	-0.57%	1.13%
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc	50.10%	14.50%	13.58%	48.71%	-35.12%	17.36%	68.98%	32.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOM.L and INTL.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019	0.16

The correlation between WCOM.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOM.L

WCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
WCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
WCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
WCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
WCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

INTL.L

INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCOM.L	INTL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	3.85	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	4.47	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.58	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.34	6.37	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.12	19.68	-0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOM.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCOM.L	INTL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	3.85	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.68	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.95	-0.29

Drawdowns

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOM.L and INTL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCOM.L	INTL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.58%	-37.71%	+10.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-15.10%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.58%	-33.54%	+23.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.41%	-36.92%	+10.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.96%	-0.17%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.36%	-11.00%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	4.90%	-2.54%

Volatility

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) is 5.33%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that WCOM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCOM.L	INTL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	9.73%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	18.45%	-4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	25.03%	-8.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	25.61%	-10.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.92%	26.29%	-12.37%

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCOM.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOM.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCOM.L and INTL.L in my portfolio?

WCOM.L and INTL.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WCOM.L or INTL.L?

On fees, WCOM.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCOM.L or INTL.L?

WCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.

What is the main difference between WCOM.L and INTL.L?

WCOM.L is categorized as Commodities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. WCOM.L tracks Optimized Roll Commodity (GBP Hedged), while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WCOM.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.