PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOM.L vs. COMM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOM.L achieves a 33.12% return, which is significantly higher than COMM.L's 26.50% return.


WCOM.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
33.12%
6M
34.26%
1Y
45.20%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*

COMM.L

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
26.50%
6M
24.77%
1Y
40.42%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WCOM.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
33.12%15.31%2.49%-7.76%11.71%25.55%-0.57%4.18%-6.00%
COMM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
26.50%8.53%6.19%-12.55%28.34%29.04%-7.09%2.79%-5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOM.L and COMM.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2018

0.73

The correlation between WCOM.L and COMM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOM.L
WCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

COMM.L
COMM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COMM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
COMM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOM.LCOMM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.34

5.37

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.12

12.27

+6.84

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the COMM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOM.L and COMM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOM.LCOMM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.17

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.76

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.52

+0.14

Drawdowns

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, roughly equal to the maximum COMM.L drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOM.L and COMM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOM.LCOMM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.58%

-28.49%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-7.49%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.58%

-14.73%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.41%

-28.49%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-3.76%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-12.16%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.28%

-0.92%

Volatility

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (WCOM.L) is 5.33%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that WCOM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOM.LCOMM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

6.13%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

16.37%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

18.53%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.50%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

15.37%

-1.45%

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOM.L vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOM.L nor COMM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOM.L and COMM.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WCOM.L.

WCOM.L tracks Optimized Roll Commodity (GBP Hedged), while COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WCOM.L and 0.19% for COMM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOM.L and COMM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer