PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOB.L vs. INTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOB.L achieves a 31.29% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 49.02% return.


WCOB.L

1D
-1.15%
1M
0.76%
YTD
31.29%
6M
30.72%
1Y
44.44%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*

INTL.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
17.90%
YTD
49.02%
6M
46.71%
1Y
90.61%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WCOB.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc
31.29%7.73%4.50%-12.06%25.92%28.89%-3.11%2.07%
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
49.02%14.50%13.58%48.71%-35.12%17.36%68.98%32.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOB.L and INTL.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2019

0.09

The correlation between WCOB.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOB.L
WCOB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
WCOB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOB.LINTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.56

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

6.14

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.38

18.98

-2.60

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is lower than the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOB.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOB.LINTL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

3.71

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.67

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.94

-0.28

Drawdowns

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOB.L drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOB.L and INTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOB.LINTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-37.71%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-15.10%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-33.54%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-36.92%

+9.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-0.88%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.70%

-10.99%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

4.90%

-2.14%

Volatility

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L) is 5.81%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that WCOB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOB.LINTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

9.37%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

18.48%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

24.97%

-7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.37%

25.61%

-10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

26.28%

-10.38%

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOB.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOB.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOB.L and INTL.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WCOB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WCOB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INTL.L.

WCOB.L is categorized as Commodities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. WCOB.L tracks Optimised Roll Commodity, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WCOB.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOB.L and INTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer