WCN vs. IGM
WCN (Waste Connections, Inc.) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, WCN returned 14.54%/yr vs 24.77%/yr for IGM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WCN vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCN achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 21.80% return. Over the past 10 years, WCN has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 14.54%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.77% annualized return.
WCN
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -10.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
IGM
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 21.80%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 44.14%
- 3Y*
- 35.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.12%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
WCN vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | -4.67% | 2.92% | 15.72% | 13.47% | -2.02% | 33.80% | 13.86% | 23.19% | 5.47% | 36.47% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 21.80% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCN and IGM is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001 | 0.41 |
The correlation between WCN and IGM shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCN vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
WCN
IGM
WCN vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCN | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 2.70 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 8.97 | -9.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCN vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCN drawdown since its inception was -68.85%, roughly equal to the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCN and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCN | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.85% | -65.59% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.69% | -16.44% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -26.39% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.75% | -40.68% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.59% | -40.68% | +9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.94% | -8.03% | -7.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -15.21% | +6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.91% | 4.94% | +6.97% |
Volatility
WCN vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) is 8.00%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that WCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCN | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 11.52% | -3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.89% | 18.62% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.50% | 22.76% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 26.07% | -6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 24.71% | -4.92% |
Dividends
WCN vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
WCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.62% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.78% | 0.70% | 1.20% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCN and IGM have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to WCN (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCN dropped -68.85% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCN and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer