PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCMNX vs. VSGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMNX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCMNX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than VSGAX's 17.46% return.


WCMNX

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.33%
YTD
10.26%
6M
8.53%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

VSGAX

1D
-1.07%
1M
3.64%
YTD
17.46%
6M
15.68%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WCMNX
WCM Small Cap Growth Fund
10.26%7.82%4.02%15.64%-23.47%5.06%38.85%4.50%
VSGAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
17.46%8.44%14.94%23.04%-28.39%5.70%35.26%6.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WCMNX and VSGAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.96

The correlation between WCMNX and VSGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCMNX vs. VSGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCMNX
WCMNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WCMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WCMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VSGAX
VSGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VSGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMNX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCMNXVSGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.89

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

10.99

-5.36

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the VSGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCMNX and VSGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCMNXVSGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.69

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.24

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.57

-0.27

Drawdowns

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCMNX drawdown since its inception was -40.70%, which is greater than VSGAX's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCMNX and VSGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMNXVSGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.70%

-38.70%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-11.37%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-27.47%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.13%

-38.36%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-1.07%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-8.55%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

2.98%

+1.70%

Volatility

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Volatility Comparison

WCM Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMNX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX) at 5.45%. This indicates that WCMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMNXVSGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

5.45%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

14.84%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.20%

19.48%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

23.56%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.21%

23.00%

+4.21%

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCMNX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VSGAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCMNX vs. VSGAX - Dividend Comparison

WCMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than VSGAX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSGAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.67%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.81%1.08%0.98%
WCMNX
WCM Small Cap Growth Fund
0.89%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.18%9.16%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, WCMNX and VSGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WCMNX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to VSGAX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCMNX dropped -40.70% vs VSGAX's -38.70%.

VSGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCMNX and VSGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer