WCEO vs. EPSB

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) and EPSB (Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WCEO returned 28.53% vs 29.72% for EPSB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPSB.

Performance

WCEO vs. EPSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCEO achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly lower than EPSB's 20.02% return.

WCEO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 12.04%
• 1Y: 28.53%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EPSB

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 20.02%
• 6M: 18.11%
• 1Y: 29.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCEO vs. EPSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	13.94%	23.42%
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	20.02%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between WCEO and EPSB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	0.84

The correlation between WCEO and EPSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

WCEO vs. EPSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCEO	EPSB
Technology	18.3%	23.3%
Financial Services	16.1%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.5%	9.3%
Industrials	13.0%	28.8%
Healthcare	10.6%	7.9%
Energy	6.8%	2.7%
Real Estate	6.0%	5.7%
Basic Materials	5.2%	6.4%
Communication Services	4.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.0%	2.9%

Return for Risk

WCEO vs. EPSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCEO

WCEO Risk / Return Rank: 71
WCEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WCEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WCEO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WCEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
WCEO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

EPSB

EPSB Risk / Return Rank: 69
EPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCEO vs. EPSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCEO	EPSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.95	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.91	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	3.53	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.82	11.98	+0.84

WCEO vs. EPSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the EPSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCEO and EPSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCEO vs. EPSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCEO drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than EPSB's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCEO and EPSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCEO	EPSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-8.46%	-17.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-8.46%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.48%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-1.53%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.49%	-0.26%

Volatility

WCEO vs. EPSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) is 3.74%, while Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that WCEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCEO	EPSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	4.96%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	11.36%	-0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.21%	15.35%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.07%	15.52%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.07%	15.52%	+2.55%

WCEO vs. EPSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSB's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCEO vs. EPSB - Dividend Comparison

WCEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than EPSB's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF	1.13%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	0.56%	0.64%	0.88%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCEO and EPSB in my portfolio?

WCEO and EPSB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCEO or EPSB?

EPSB has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to WCEO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCEO dropped -25.88% vs EPSB's -8.46%.

Which ETF is better, WCEO or EPSB?

On 1-year performance, EPSB leads with 29.72% vs 28.53% for WCEO. On fees, WCEO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCEO or EPSB?

Over the 1-year period, EPSB has performed better with a 29.72% return vs 28.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCEO or EPSB?

WCEO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCEO or EPSB?

EPSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.56% for WCEO.

What is the main difference between WCEO and EPSB?

They also come from different issuers: Hypatia Capital and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCEO and 0.88% for EPSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.