PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBSIX vs. DMCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBSIX achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 25.20% return. Over the past 10 years, WBSIX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 14.65%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.49% annualized return.


WBSIX

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.44%
YTD
14.56%
6M
16.81%
1Y
31.17%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
14.65%

DMCRX

1D
0.10%
1M
5.08%
YTD
25.20%
6M
31.61%
1Y
81.24%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
22.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
14.56%3.03%32.88%16.38%-21.46%12.64%38.87%22.53%-2.08%26.81%
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
25.20%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%34.03%2.52%24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between WBSIX and DMCRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2013

0.88

The correlation between WBSIX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBSIX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBSIX
WBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WBSIXDMCRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

2.97

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

3.46

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

5.29

-2.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.11

18.84

-9.73

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBSIX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WBSIXDMCRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.97

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.28

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.66

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.59

-0.05

Drawdowns

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBSIX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -59.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBSIX and DMCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBSIXDMCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-59.16%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-15.46%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-34.92%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.13%

-59.16%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-59.16%

+20.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.38%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-20.11%

+8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

4.34%

-0.83%

Volatility

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) is 5.50%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that WBSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBSIXDMCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

8.30%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

21.11%

-6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

28.52%

-8.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

39.48%

-15.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

33.98%

-10.96%

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBSIX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

WBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than DMCRX's 10.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
10.96%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
6.54%7.49%20.14%1.53%3.55%17.85%9.73%2.07%12.60%16.89%5.42%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBSIX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMCRX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to WBSIX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBSIX dropped -62.35% vs DMCRX's -59.16%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBSIX and DMCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer