WATFX vs. FTHRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WATFX (Western Asset Core Bond Fund) and FTHRX (Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, WATFX returned 1.45%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for FTHRX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WATFX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTHRX.

Performance

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WATFX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WATFX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than FTHRX's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, WATFX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.45%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.95% annualized return.

WATFX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 3.52%
• 5Y*: -1.09%
• 10Y*: 1.45%

FTHRX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 3.22%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: 1.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WATFX Western Asset Core Bond Fund	-0.36%	8.01%	0.44%	5.52%	-17.32%	-2.13%	9.12%	10.44%	-0.62%	5.21%
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund	-0.24%	6.89%	3.25%	5.55%	-9.17%	-1.60%	7.06%	7.20%	0.52%	2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between WATFX and FTHRX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1990	0.83

The correlation between WATFX and FTHRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WATFX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WATFX

WATFX Risk / Return Rank: 18
WATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
WATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
WATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
WATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
WATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FTHRX

FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WATFX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WATFX	FTHRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.20	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.84	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.22	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.59	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.14	4.39	-0.25

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WATFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WATFX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WATFX drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATFX and FTHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WATFX	FTHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-19.01%	-4.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	-2.11%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.35%	-2.68%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.26%	-13.18%	-10.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.69%	-13.25%	-10.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-1.48%	-6.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-3.06%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	0.76%	+0.33%

Volatility

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WATFX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.87%. This indicates that WATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WATFX	FTHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	0.87%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.96%	2.09%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	2.80%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.83%	4.04%	+2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.54%	3.40%	+2.14%

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WATFX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

WATFX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

WATFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FTHRX's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund	3.71%	3.59%	3.49%	2.94%	1.55%	1.53%	4.16%	2.49%	2.48%	2.20%	2.63%	2.13%
WATFX Western Asset Core Bond Fund	3.95%	4.15%	4.48%	3.35%	2.39%	2.05%	3.90%	3.62%	2.92%	2.34%	2.51%	2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WATFX and FTHRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, WATFX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WATFX or FTHRX?

WATFX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to FTHRX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WATFX dropped -23.69% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.