WASMX vs. ATGAX
WASMX (Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WASMX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WASMX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
ATGAX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WASMX Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund | 0.16% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between WASMX and ATGAX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WASMX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
WASMX
ATGAX
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WASMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WASMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 18.80 | -18.21 |
Drawdowns
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASMX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WASMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.74% | -0.36% | -37.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | -0.36% | -5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -0.09% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WASMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 11.18% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 11.18% | +5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 11.18% | +7.42% |
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WASMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WASMX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
WASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WASMX Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund | 1.63% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 0.52% | 4.90% | 4.75% | 1.86% | 9.96% | 4.40% | 0.52% | 5.41% | 7.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WASMX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WASMX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer