PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WASCX vs. MSTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) and Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WASCX achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than MSTGX's 5.95% return.


WASCX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
3.90%
6M
3.13%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
8.48%

MSTGX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.01%
YTD
5.95%
6M
5.76%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WASCX
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund
3.90%16.07%13.12%14.62%-14.57%12.88%12.53%20.90%-5.31%
MSTGX
Morningstar Global Income Fund
5.95%12.04%5.36%11.91%-11.18%8.46%3.92%19.97%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between WASCX and MSTGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between WASCX and MSTGX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WASCX vs. MSTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WASCX
WASCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
WASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTGX
MSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) and Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WASCXMSTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.12

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

9.91

-3.83

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MSTGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WASCX and MSTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WASCX drawdown since its inception was -36.09%, which is greater than MSTGX's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASCX and MSTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WASCXMSTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.09%

-27.52%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-4.38%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.21%

-6.56%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-19.64%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-1.26%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-4.31%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.26%

+0.82%

Volatility

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) at 1.90%. This indicates that WASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WASCXMSTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

1.90%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

4.99%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

6.50%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

8.14%

+9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

10.81%

+4.85%

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WASCX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

WASCX vs. MSTGX - Dividend Comparison

WASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than MSTGX's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSTGX
Morningstar Global Income Fund
2.92%2.97%6.64%6.32%8.79%10.48%2.96%4.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WASCX
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund
9.96%10.75%8.30%2.28%18.75%11.68%2.22%5.49%20.62%2.37%0.00%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WASCX and MSTGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WASCX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to MSTGX (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WASCX dropped -36.09% vs MSTGX's -27.52%.

MSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WASCX and MSTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer