PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WASCX vs. GIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WASCX achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than GIMFX's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WASCX has outperformed GIMFX with an annualized return of 8.55%, while GIMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.


WASCX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.91%
YTD
6.61%
6M
7.44%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
8.55%

GIMFX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.11%
YTD
14.16%
6M
16.37%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WASCX
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund
6.61%16.07%13.12%14.62%-14.57%12.88%12.53%20.90%-5.98%17.53%
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
14.16%25.37%2.67%14.75%-1.24%4.05%-7.25%13.24%-5.58%14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WASCX and GIMFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.73

The correlation between WASCX and GIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WASCX vs. GIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WASCX
WASCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
WASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
WASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

GIMFX
GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WASCXGIMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

4.13

-2.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

5.83

-3.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.83

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

5.00

-3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.14

19.42

-11.28

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the GIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WASCX and GIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WASCXGIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

4.13

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.12

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.71

-0.16

Drawdowns

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WASCX drawdown since its inception was -36.09%, which is greater than GIMFX's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASCX and GIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WASCXGIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.09%

-25.87%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-6.53%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.21%

-8.02%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-14.02%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.42%

-25.87%

-3.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-4.29%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.68%

+0.36%

Volatility

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) at 2.84%. This indicates that WASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WASCXGIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

2.84%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

6.22%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.24%

7.93%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

8.58%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

8.98%

+6.62%

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WASCX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMFX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

WASCX vs. GIMFX - Dividend Comparison

WASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, more than GIMFX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
3.75%4.28%3.39%5.93%3.59%3.28%2.25%3.99%4.59%2.95%1.98%0.00%
WASCX
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund
10.04%10.75%8.30%2.28%18.75%11.68%2.22%5.49%20.62%2.37%0.00%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WASCX and GIMFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WASCX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to GIMFX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WASCX dropped -36.09% vs GIMFX's -25.87%.

GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WASCX and GIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer