WASCX vs. GGSIX
WASCX (Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund) and GGSIX (Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, WASCX returned 8.63%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for GGSIX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WASCX charges 2.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GGSIX.
Performance
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WASCX achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than GGSIX's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WASCX has underperformed GGSIX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while GGSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.
WASCX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
GGSIX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WASCX Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund | 5.36% | 16.07% | 13.12% | 14.62% | -14.57% | 12.88% | 12.53% | 20.90% | -5.98% | 17.53% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 10.03% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WASCX and GGSIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998 | 0.77 |
The correlation between WASCX and GGSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WASCX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank
WASCX
GGSIX
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WASCX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 2.98 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | 12.98 | -5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WASCX drawdown since its inception was -36.09%, smaller than the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASCX and GGSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WASCX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -52.85% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.71% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.21% | -14.78% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -26.74% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.42% | -30.36% | +0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.40% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -9.19% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.99% | +0.08% |
Volatility
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund (WASCX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WASCX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.56% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.58% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 11.61% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 13.53% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 14.37% | +1.29% |
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WASCX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
WASCX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison
WASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, less than GGSIX's 10.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 10.79% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
WASCX Delaware Ivy Asset Strategy Fund | 9.82% | 10.75% | 8.30% | 2.28% | 18.75% | 11.68% | 2.22% | 5.49% | 20.62% | 2.37% | 0.00% | 6.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, WASCX and GGSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WASCX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to GGSIX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WASCX dropped -36.09% vs GGSIX's -52.85%.
GGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WASCX and GGSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer