WARAX vs. TRXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX).
WARAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012. TRXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 28, 2011.
Performance
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 14.79% | 8.07% | 5.93% | 12.53% | -2.75% | 2.25% | -3.25% | 11.65% | -5.78% | 12.11% |
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.23% | 16.16% | 4.67% | 5.23% | -7.44% | 9.65% | 3.62% | 11.51% | -3.30% | 11.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WARAX achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than TRXAX's 2.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WARAX having a 5.60% annualized return and TRXAX not far behind at 5.41%.
WARAX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
TRXAX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TRXAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WARAX vs. TRXAX — Risk / Return Rank
WARAX
TRXAX
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WARAX | TRXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 1.98 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 2.68 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.40 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 2.55 | +1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.20 | 10.37 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARAX | TRXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.98 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.63 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.66 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.68 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between WARAX and TRXAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Dividend Comparison
WARAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than TRXAX's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 1.74% | 2.00% | 10.90% | 2.80% | 2.34% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.35% |
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.28% | 2.45% | 4.93% | 5.12% | 0.83% | 6.76% | 1.91% | 2.66% | 8.34% | 3.46% | 3.55% | 1.59% |
Drawdowns
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, which is greater than TRXAX's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARAX and TRXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARAX | TRXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.16% | -20.50% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.06% | -5.60% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.64% | -16.03% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.16% | -20.50% | -2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -5.20% | +4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -2.67% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.38% | +0.77% |
Volatility
WARAX vs. TRXAX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) at 2.51%. This indicates that WARAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WARAX | TRXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 2.51% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 4.86% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 7.42% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 7.88% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 8.26% | -0.35% |