WARAX vs. TRXAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WARAX (Allspring Absolute Return Fund) and TRXAX (Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, WARAX returned 5.57%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for TRXAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WARAX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for TRXAX.

Performance

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WARAX achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than TRXAX's 6.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WARAX having a 5.57% annualized return and TRXAX not far ahead at 5.76%.

WARAX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 14.88%
• 6M: 15.29%
• 1Y: 25.36%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 5.57%

TRXAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 6.36%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 5.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	14.88%	8.07%	5.93%	12.53%	-2.75%	2.25%	-3.25%	11.65%	-5.78%	12.11%
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	6.41%	16.16%	4.67%	5.23%	-7.44%	9.65%	3.62%	11.51%	-3.30%	11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WARAX and TRXAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012	0.69

The correlation between WARAX and TRXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WARAX vs. TRXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WARAX

WARAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
WARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
WARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
WARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
WARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

TRXAX

TRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
TRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
TRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WARAX	TRXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.20	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	3.12	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.41	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.62	2.50	+4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.03	8.33	+11.70

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WARAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the TRXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WARAX and TRXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, which is greater than TRXAX's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARAX and TRXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WARAX	TRXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.16%	-20.50%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	-5.60%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.67%	-6.04%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.05%	-16.03%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.16%	-20.50%	-2.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-1.33%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-2.66%	-1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.68%	-0.42%

Volatility

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) at 2.13%. This indicates that WARAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WARAX	TRXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	2.13%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.38%	5.12%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.85%	6.37%	+2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.75%	7.86%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.97%	8.27%	-0.30%

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TRXAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

WARAX vs. TRXAX - Dividend Comparison

WARAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than TRXAX's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	2.19%	2.45%	4.93%	5.12%	0.83%	6.76%	1.91%	2.66%	8.34%	3.46%	3.55%	1.59%
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	1.74%	2.00%	10.90%	2.80%	2.34%	3.23%	3.34%	3.38%	2.66%	1.77%	0.76%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WARAX and TRXAX in my portfolio?

WARAX and TRXAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WARAX or TRXAX?

WARAX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to TRXAX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WARAX dropped -23.16% vs TRXAX's -20.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WARAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.