WARAX vs. GIMFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WARAX (Allspring Absolute Return Fund) and GIMFX (GMO Implementation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, WARAX returned 5.89%/yr vs 7.25%/yr for GIMFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WARAX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GIMFX.

Performance

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WARAX achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than GIMFX's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WARAX has underperformed GIMFX with an annualized return of 5.89%, while GIMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.25% annualized return.

WARAX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.03%
• 1Y: 28.57%
• 3Y*: 14.34%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 5.89%

GIMFX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 6M: 16.16%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 7.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	18.97%	8.07%	5.93%	12.53%	-2.75%	2.25%	-3.25%	11.65%	-5.78%	12.11%
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund	14.03%	25.37%	2.67%	14.75%	-1.24%	4.05%	-7.25%	13.24%	-5.58%	14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WARAX and GIMFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between WARAX and GIMFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WARAX vs. GIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WARAX

WARAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
WARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
WARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
WARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
WARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
WARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GIMFX

GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WARAX	GIMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.48	4.13	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.89	5.84	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.83	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.67	5.01	+2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.99	19.44	+7.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WARAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is comparable to the GIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WARAX and GIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WARAX	GIMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48	4.13	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	1.11	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.81	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.70	-0.08

Drawdowns

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, smaller than the maximum GIMFX drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARAX and GIMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WARAX	GIMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.16%	-25.87%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.79%	-6.53%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.67%	-8.02%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.64%	-14.02%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.16%	-25.87%	+2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.11%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-4.29%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.68%	-0.61%

Volatility

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) is 2.40%, while GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that WARAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WARAX	GIMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	2.78%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.77%	6.21%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.37%	7.92%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.66%	8.58%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.93%	8.98%	-1.05%

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMFX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

WARAX vs. GIMFX - Dividend Comparison

WARAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than GIMFX's 3.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund	3.75%	4.28%	3.39%	5.93%	3.59%	3.28%	2.25%	3.99%	4.59%	2.95%	1.98%	0.00%
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	1.68%	2.00%	10.90%	2.80%	2.34%	3.23%	3.34%	3.38%	2.66%	1.77%	0.76%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WARAX and GIMFX in my portfolio?

WARAX and GIMFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WARAX or GIMFX?

GIMFX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to WARAX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WARAX dropped -23.16% vs GIMFX's -25.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 3.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.