PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAFMX vs. WHOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) and Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAFMX achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than WHOSX's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WAFMX has outperformed WHOSX with an annualized return of 3.50%, while WHOSX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.61% annualized return.


WAFMX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
3.06%
6M
1.92%
1Y
-1.85%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
-1.64%
10Y*
3.50%

WHOSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
-3.84%
5Y*
-7.75%
10Y*
-2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAFMX
Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund
3.06%4.35%10.67%28.16%-41.11%8.60%28.24%26.47%-18.49%21.16%
WHOSX
Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund
-1.05%2.34%-10.95%1.39%-34.13%-4.94%20.05%17.15%-3.84%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between WAFMX and WHOSX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2012

-0.07

The correlation between WAFMX and WHOSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAFMX vs. WHOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAFMX
WAFMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WAFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WAFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

WHOSX
WHOSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
WHOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
WHOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) and Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAFMXWHOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.09

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

0.66

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.32

1.19

-1.51

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAFMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the WHOSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAFMX and WHOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAFMXWHOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

0.44

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.44

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

-0.15

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.30

+0.03

Drawdowns

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAFMX drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, smaller than the maximum WHOSX drawdown of -53.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAFMX and WHOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAFMXWHOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.51%

-53.95%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-7.80%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-20.73%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.51%

-47.93%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.51%

-53.95%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.37%

-49.28%

+29.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-11.45%

-5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

4.33%

+0.69%

Volatility

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund (WHOSX) at 0.18%. This indicates that WAFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAFMXWHOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

0.18%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

6.97%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

11.74%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

17.56%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

17.24%

-0.37%

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAFMX has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than WHOSX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAFMX vs. WHOSX - Dividend Comparison

WAFMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WHOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAFMX
Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
WHOSX
Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund
4.11%4.05%3.80%2.90%2.45%1.31%7.99%1.83%2.22%1.96%10.89%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAFMX and WHOSX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAFMX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to WHOSX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAFMX dropped -49.51% vs WHOSX's -53.95%.

WHOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAFMX and WHOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer