WAFMX vs. LVAZX
WAFMX (Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund) and LVAZX (LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, WAFMX returned -2.29%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for LVAZX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAFMX charges 2.15%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for LVAZX.
Performance
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAFMX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than LVAZX's 27.68% return.
WAFMX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 1Y
- -2.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.63%
LVAZX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- YTD
- 27.68%
- 1Y
- 47.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAFMX Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund | 3.61% | 4.35% | 10.67% | 28.16% | -41.11% | 8.60% | 28.24% | 18.50% |
LVAZX LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 27.68% | 39.90% | 7.26% | 21.26% | -13.03% | 13.77% | 5.03% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAFMX and LVAZX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between WAFMX and LVAZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAFMX vs. LVAZX — Risk / Return Rank
WAFMX
LVAZX
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAFMX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.47 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 4.18 | -4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 13.93 | -14.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAFMX drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than LVAZX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAFMX and LVAZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAFMX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.51% | -37.87% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -11.44% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -15.02% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.51% | -27.07% | -22.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -6.47% | -12.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.80% | -6.75% | -10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 3.43% | +1.79% |
Volatility
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) is 4.59%, while LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that WAFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAFMX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 9.05% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 17.62% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 19.20% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 15.21% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 16.34% | +0.58% |
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAFMX has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAZX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAFMX vs. LVAZX - Dividend Comparison
WAFMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAZX LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 4.01% | 5.12% | 1.39% | 4.58% | 3.14% | 8.50% | 2.54% | 2.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WAFMX Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAFMX and LVAZX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVAZX has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to WAFMX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAFMX dropped -49.51% vs LVAZX's -37.87%.
LVAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAFMX and LVAZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer