PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAEMX vs. LVAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAEMX achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly lower than LVAZX's 29.87% return.


WAEMX

1D
-3.24%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
22.94%
6M
22.22%
1Y
29.67%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
8.64%

LVAZX

1D
-4.78%
1M
3.23%
YTD
29.87%
6M
31.71%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
29.58%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
22.94%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%24.75%
LVAZX
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund
29.87%39.90%7.26%21.26%-13.03%13.77%5.03%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between WAEMX and LVAZX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019

0.69

The correlation between WAEMX and LVAZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAEMX vs. LVAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAZX
LVAZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LVAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WAEMXLVAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.61

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

5.04

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.13

18.58

-6.44

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the LVAZX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAEMX and LVAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, which is greater than LVAZX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAEMX and LVAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAEMXLVAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-37.87%

-28.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-11.44%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-15.02%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-27.07%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-4.87%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.78%

-6.75%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.10%

-0.41%

Volatility

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) is 8.04%, while LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that WAEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAEMXLVAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

10.75%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

16.56%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

18.32%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

14.96%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.23%

+2.04%

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAEMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAZX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAEMX vs. LVAZX - Dividend Comparison

WAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.26%, more than LVAZX's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAZX
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.94%5.12%1.39%4.58%3.14%8.50%2.54%2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
57.26%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAEMX and LVAZX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVAZX has higher volatility (10.75%) compared to WAEMX (8.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAEMX dropped -66.35% vs LVAZX's -37.87%.

LVAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAEMX and LVAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer