PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAEMX vs. FGKPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAEMX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than FGKPX's 12.75% return.


WAEMX

1D
1.05%
1M
-8.53%
6M
9.04%
YTD
13.53%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
6.79%
ALL TIME*
5.19%

FGKPX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
6M
9.98%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
13.53%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%22.17%
FGKPX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
12.75%12.56%5.96%15.28%-12.98%10.75%5.22%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WAEMX and FGKPX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.69

The correlation between WAEMX and FGKPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAEMX vs. FGKPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FGKPX
FGKPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FGKPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WAEMXFGKPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.41

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

6.19

+0.03

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the FGKPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAEMX and FGKPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, which is greater than FGKPX's maximum drawdown of -32.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAEMX and FGKPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAEMXFGKPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-32.05%

-34.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

-6.93%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-12.67%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-20.69%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.01%

-4.34%

-11.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-5.28%

-11.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.69%

+0.92%

Volatility

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX) at 4.43%. This indicates that WAEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGKPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAEMXFGKPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

4.43%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.63%

10.84%

+6.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.96%

11.80%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

10.61%

+7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

12.66%

+5.74%

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAEMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKPX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAEMX vs. FGKPX - Dividend Comparison

WAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.01%, more than FGKPX's 6.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKPX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
6.87%7.75%5.07%2.91%1.88%2.30%1.77%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
62.01%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAEMX and FGKPX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAEMX has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to FGKPX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAEMX dropped -66.35% vs FGKPX's -32.05%.

FGKPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAEMX and FGKPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer