PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAEMX vs. CEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAEMX achieves a 24.12% return, which is significantly lower than CEMIX's 36.68% return. Over the past 10 years, WAEMX has underperformed CEMIX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while CEMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.


WAEMX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
24.12%
6M
28.17%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
8.47%

CEMIX

1D
0.97%
1M
10.77%
YTD
36.68%
6M
41.26%
1Y
71.52%
3Y*
32.96%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
24.12%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%
CEMIX
Causeway Emerging Markets Fund
36.68%36.22%14.90%17.13%-23.05%-0.83%16.95%16.73%-17.91%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between WAEMX and CEMIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.77

The correlation between WAEMX and CEMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAEMX vs. CEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMIX
CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAEMXCEMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.65

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

5.31

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

21.17

-7.26

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the CEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAEMX and CEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAEMXCEMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

3.61

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.68

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.67

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.03

Drawdowns

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMIX drawdown of -68.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAEMX and CEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAEMXCEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-68.90%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-13.61%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-17.92%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-36.56%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-39.59%

-5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.18%

0.00%

-8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.81%

-15.79%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.40%

-0.86%

Volatility

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) is 5.82%, while Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that WAEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAEMXCEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

8.26%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

17.06%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

20.04%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

17.69%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.40%

-0.21%

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAEMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMIX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAEMX vs. CEMIX - Dividend Comparison

WAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.72%, more than CEMIX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMIX
Causeway Emerging Markets Fund
1.83%2.49%3.73%4.85%4.87%23.35%1.36%2.03%2.01%1.58%1.55%1.69%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
56.72%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAEMX and CEMIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEMIX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to WAEMX (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAEMX dropped -66.35% vs CEMIX's -68.90%.

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAEMX and CEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer