WAAEX vs. NESIX
WAAEX (Wasatch Small Cap Growth Fund) and NESIX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WAAEX returned -6.02%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for NESIX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAAEX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for NESIX.
Performance
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAAEX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 76.59% return.
WAAEX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- -5.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- -6.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
NESIX
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 76.59%
- 6M
- 72.42%
- 1Y
- 107.12%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAAEX Wasatch Small Cap Growth Fund | -1.10% | -8.78% | 15.50% | 21.24% | -40.26% | 7.68% | 54.65% | 40.29% | 2.42% | 21.72% |
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional | 76.59% | 11.16% | 13.47% | 5.85% | -29.71% | 11.36% | 73.06% | 55.28% | -4.87% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAAEX and NESIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between WAAEX and NESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAAEX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank
WAAEX
NESIX
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Growth Fund (WAAEX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAAEX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.52 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 6.66 | -6.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 27.09 | -27.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAAEX drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, which is greater than NESIX's maximum drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAAEX and NESIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAAEX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.48% | -49.61% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -17.12% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -35.21% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.51% | -49.61% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.08% | -4.35% | -28.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -14.92% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 4.20% | +2.83% |
Volatility
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wasatch Small Cap Growth Fund (WAAEX) is 4.83%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that WAAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAAEX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 12.86% | -8.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 22.69% | -8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 31.59% | -12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.46% | 29.64% | -4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 26.59% | -1.51% |
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAAEX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAAEX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison
WAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.93% | 23.92% | 13.26% | 8.25% | 21.96% | 8.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WAAEX Wasatch Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.99% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.65% | 6.25% | 14.78% | 38.79% | 11.70% | 8.83% | 18.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAAEX and NESIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NESIX has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to WAAEX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAAEX dropped -56.48% vs NESIX's -49.61%.
NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAAEX and NESIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer