PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VZ vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VZ vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZ achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VZ has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 4.44%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.


VZ

1D
2.49%
1M
3.75%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.44%

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VZ vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
21.97%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VZ and NFLX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.12

The correlation between VZ and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VZ:

$202.54B

NFLX:

$345.34B

EPS

VZ:

$4.10

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

VZ:

11.72

NFLX:

25.99

PS Ratio

VZ:

1.46

NFLX:

7.41

PB Ratio

VZ:

1.96

NFLX:

11.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

VZ:

$139.15B

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VZ:

$81.89B

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

VZ:

$48.65B

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VZ vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VZ vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VZNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.81

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.78

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

-1.35

+4.40

VZ vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZ and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZ vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZ drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZ and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VZNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-81.99%

+31.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-43.35%

+30.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-43.35%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.38%

-75.95%

+37.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

-75.95%

+34.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-40.01%

+35.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-24.91%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

25.19%

-18.96%

Volatility

VZ vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that VZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VZNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

5.85%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

24.58%

-6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

33.05%

-10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

43.09%

-21.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

41.49%

-21.13%

Dividends

VZ vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.75%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

VZ vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verizon Communications Inc. and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
34.44B
12.25B
(VZ) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VZ vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Verizon Communications Inc. and Netflix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
60.3%
51.9%
Portfolio components
VZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.77B and revenue of 34.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

VZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 8.24B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

VZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a net income of 5.05B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VZ and NFLX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VZ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZ dropped -50.66% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZ and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer