PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VZ vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VZ vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZ achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than IWS's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VZ has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 4.44%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


VZ

1D
2.49%
1M
3.75%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.44%

IWS

1D
1.16%
1M
5.35%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.28%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VZ vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
21.97%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.45%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VZ and IWS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2001

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between VZ and IWS has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VZ vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VZ vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VZIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.68

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

13.82

-10.76

VZ vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZ and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZ vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZ drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZ and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VZIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-62.40%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-7.53%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-20.57%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.38%

-21.23%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

-43.83%

+2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

0.00%

-4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-8.01%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

2.00%

+4.23%

Volatility

VZ vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 4.29%. This indicates that VZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VZIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

4.29%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

9.97%

+7.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

13.53%

+9.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

17.36%

+4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

19.37%

+0.99%

Dividends

VZ vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.32%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.75%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


VZ and IWS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VZ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZ dropped -50.66% vs IWS's -62.40%.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZ and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer