VXUS vs. EMXC
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VXUS returned 8.32%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VXUS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
VXUS vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
EMXC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 37.25%
- 6M
- 42.23%
- 1Y
- 65.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.69% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 7.83% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.25% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXUS and EMXC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VXUS and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXUS vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXUS
EMXC
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VXUS
EMXC
Technology
VXUS
EMXC
Industrials
VXUS
EMXC
Consumer Cyclical
VXUS
EMXC
Basic Materials
VXUS
EMXC
Healthcare
VXUS
EMXC
Energy
VXUS
EMXC
Consumer Defensive
VXUS
EMXC
Communication Services
VXUS
EMXC
Utilities
VXUS
EMXC
Real Estate
VXUS
EMXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXUS vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
VXUS
EMXC
VXUS vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXUS | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 4.55 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 17.51 | -7.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXUS vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXUS | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -42.81% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -14.41% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -19.12% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -28.91% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -4.12% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -10.17% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.74% | -0.81% |
Volatility
VXUS vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is 6.71%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that VXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXUS | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 12.83% | -6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 21.90% | -7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 23.90% | -7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 18.00% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 20.07% | -2.87% |
VXUS vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VXUS vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than EMXC's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.67% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXUS and EMXC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to VXUS (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.14% vs 8.32% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.05% for EMXC.
VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXUS and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer