VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VXM.TO (CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXM.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Morningstar® Developed Markets ex-North America Target Value Index, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. VXM.TO is passively managed, while CASH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VXM.TO returned 28.73%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VXM.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.

Performance

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged (VXM.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXM.TO achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.84% return.

VXM.TO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 10.65%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 37.70%
• 3Y*: 28.73%
• 5Y*: 19.67%
• 10Y*: 13.39%

CASH.TO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 2.23%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VXM.TO CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged	10.65%	44.77%	19.29%	24.09%	3.19%	-1.96%
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	0.84%	2.45%	4.53%	5.11%	2.39%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VXM.TO and CASH.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.00

Return for Risk

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXM.TO

VXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
VXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
VXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CASH.TO

CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged (VXM.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VXM.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	10.38	-7.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	32.63	-28.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	7.50	-5.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	112.00	-107.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.81	470.40	-455.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is lower than the CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 10.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXM.TO and CASH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VXM.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	10.38	-7.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	5.52	-4.88

Drawdowns

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXM.TO and CASH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VXM.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.73%	-0.80%	-41.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-0.02%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.71%	-0.06%	-13.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	0.00%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.51%	-0.00%	-7.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	0.00%	+2.55%

Volatility

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged (VXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that VXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VXM.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	0.06%	+5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	0.13%	+10.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.99%	0.22%	+12.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	0.61%	+14.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	0.61%	+16.36%

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXM.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

VXM.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison

VXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	2.19%	2.53%	4.37%	5.06%	2.30%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VXM.TO CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged	2.13%	2.03%	3.60%	3.37%	3.54%	2.08%	2.27%	1.56%	2.07%	1.51%	1.85%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VXM.TO and CASH.TO in my portfolio?

VXM.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VXM.TO or CASH.TO?

On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VXM.TO or CASH.TO?

CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for VXM.TO.

What is the main difference between VXM.TO and CASH.TO?

VXM.TO is categorized as International Equity, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for VXM.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.