PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXM-B.TO achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than XCSR.TO's 6.62% return.


VXM-B.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.74%
YTD
10.02%
6M
12.18%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
28.33%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
11.90%

XCSR.TO

1D
-1.10%
1M
4.20%
YTD
6.62%
6M
7.53%
1Y
30.67%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VXM-B.TO
CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)
10.02%46.74%18.25%18.98%-2.49%9.58%19.07%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
6.62%35.35%23.27%15.18%-14.41%22.30%4,511.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VXM-B.TO and XCSR.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020

0.32

The correlation between VXM-B.TO and XCSR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (5 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXM-B.TO
VXM-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VXM-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XCSR.TO
XCSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VXM-B.TOXCSR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.77

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

11.03

+1.38

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXM-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the XCSR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXM-B.TO and XCSR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VXM-B.TOXCSR.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.04

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.74

0.97

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.08

+0.79

Drawdowns

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXM-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than XCSR.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXM-B.TO and XCSR.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXM-B.TOXCSR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-23.56%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-11.12%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-12.14%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-23.56%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-1.10%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-5.12%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.79%

-0.02%

Volatility

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) is 3.79%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF (XCSR.TO) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that VXM-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCSR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXM-B.TOXCSR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.10%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

12.45%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

15.07%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

13.94%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

1,368.32%

-1,349.41%

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXM-B.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XCSR.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXM-B.TO vs. XCSR.TO - Dividend Comparison

VXM-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than XCSR.TO's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VXM-B.TO
CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)
2.33%2.21%3.97%3.66%3.67%2.05%2.18%1.59%6.77%1.52%1.92%2.16%
XCSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI Canada Index ETF
1.65%1.73%2.20%2.61%2.78%1.53%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXM-B.TO and XCSR.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCSR.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for VXM-B.TO.

VXM-B.TO is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while XCSR.TO is Canada Equities. VXM-B.TO tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Value Index, while XCSR.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for VXM-B.TO and 0.17% for XCSR.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXM-B.TO and XCSR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer