PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) and Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXM-B.TO achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than VEQT.TO's 12.75% return.


VXM-B.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.74%
YTD
10.02%
6M
12.18%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
28.33%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
11.90%

VEQT.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
6.10%
YTD
12.75%
6M
12.66%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VXM-B.TO
CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)
10.02%46.74%18.25%18.98%-2.49%9.58%-10.23%4.93%
VEQT.TO
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio
12.75%20.37%24.73%16.70%-10.76%19.62%11.42%12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VXM-B.TO and VEQT.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.43

Over the past year, VXM-B.TO and VEQT.TO have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXM-B.TO
VXM-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VXM-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXM-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VEQT.TO
VEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) and Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VXM-B.TOVEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.95

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

17.38

-4.97

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXM-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the VEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXM-B.TO and VEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VXM-B.TOVEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.74

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.74

1.09

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.91

-0.03

Drawdowns

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXM-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than VEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXM-B.TO and VEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXM-B.TOVEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-30.45%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-8.05%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-15.46%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-18.32%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-0.54%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-3.71%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.83%

+0.94%

Volatility

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) and Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXM-B.TOVEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.68%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

9.37%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

11.61%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

12.90%

+5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

15.77%

+3.14%

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXM-B.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VEQT.TO's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXM-B.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

VXM-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than VEQT.TO's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEQT.TO
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio
1.26%1.42%1.58%1.88%2.09%1.40%1.48%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXM-B.TO
CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)
2.33%2.21%3.97%3.66%3.67%2.05%2.18%1.59%6.77%1.52%1.92%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXM-B.TO and VEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for VXM-B.TO.

VXM-B.TO is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for VXM-B.TO and 0.24% for VEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXM-B.TO and VEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer