VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L
VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and VFEM.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while VFEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRP.L returned 12.46%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for VFEM.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.22% expense ratio.
Performance
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VWRP.L having a 11.92% return and VFEM.L slightly lower at 11.78%.
VWRP.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VFEM.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 30.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 11.92% | 13.94% | 19.60% | 15.64% | -8.41% | 20.00% | 12.27% | 1.72% |
VFEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing | 11.78% | 16.90% | 15.28% | 5.45% | -3.23% | 3.99% | 15.04% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRP.L and VFEM.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VWRP.L and VFEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Financial Services
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Industrials
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Communication Services
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Healthcare
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Consumer Defensive
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Energy
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Basic Materials
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Utilities
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Real Estate
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRP.L
VFEM.L
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRP.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.40 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 3.46 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.06 | 11.41 | +5.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRP.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.23 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.57 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.54 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum VFEM.L drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRP.L and VFEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRP.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -31.32% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -8.92% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -14.68% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -15.28% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -1.46% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -6.87% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 2.71% | -0.96% |
Volatility
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) is 2.95%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.L) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that VWRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRP.L | VFEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 5.23% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 11.12% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 13.85% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 15.47% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 17.50% | -2.54% |
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VWRP.L and VFEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRP.L vs. VFEM.L - Dividend Comparison
VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.93% | 6.58% | 7.88% | 6.20% | 4.92% | 3.39% | 3.61% | 2.98% | 2.96% | 4.36% |
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRP.L and VFEM.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.22% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRP.L and VFEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.22% per year.
VWRP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VFEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VFEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD.
Find the right allocation for VWRP.L and VFEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer