PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRP.L achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than VAGP.L's 0.30% return.


VWRP.L

1D
1.65%
1M
0.75%
YTD
10.60%
6M
11.30%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*

VAGP.L

1D
0.18%
1M
1.12%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.92%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VWRP.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.60%13.94%19.60%15.64%-8.41%20.00%12.27%1.72%
VAGP.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
0.30%4.93%2.54%5.85%-13.82%-2.05%5.34%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRP.L and VAGP.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019

-0.01

The correlation between VWRP.L and VAGP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRP.L
VWRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGP.L
VAGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRP.LVAGP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.16

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.09

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.17

3.10

+12.07

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRP.L and VAGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, which is greater than VAGP.L's maximum drawdown of -18.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRP.L and VAGP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRP.LVAGP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-18.13%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-2.77%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-4.01%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

-17.71%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-3.65%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-6.65%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.98%

+0.81%

Volatility

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) at 1.42%. This indicates that VWRP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRP.LVAGP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

1.42%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

2.81%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

3.38%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

4.79%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

4.50%

+10.46%

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRP.L vs. VAGP.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
VAGP.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
3.55%3.50%3.08%2.37%1.46%0.86%1.21%0.59%
VWRP.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRP.L and VAGP.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRP.L.

VWRP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VAGP.L is Global Bonds. VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VAGP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRP.L and 0.10% for VAGP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRP.L and VAGP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer