VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and HMWO.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VWRP.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while HMWO.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRP.L returned 12.46%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for HMWO.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VWRP.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMWO.L.

Performance

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VWRP.L is traded in GBP, while HMWO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMWO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRP.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than HMWO.L's 9.53% return.

VWRP.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 5.32%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 29.91%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

HMWO.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 25.75%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	11.92%	13.94%	19.60%	15.64%	-8.41%	20.00%	12.27%	1.72%
HMWO.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF	9.53%	11.10%	19.31%	15.79%	-10.00%	22.25%	10.57%	0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRP.L and HMWO.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019	0.98

The correlation between VWRP.L and HMWO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWRP.L	HMWO.L
Technology	29.0%	30.2%
Financial Services	16.1%	15.4%
Industrials	11.0%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.0%
Communication Services	8.8%	9.1%
Healthcare	8.0%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.2%
Energy	4.2%	4.1%
Basic Materials	3.8%	3.2%
Utilities	2.7%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRP.L

VWRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VWRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VWRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
VWRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
VWRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

HMWO.L

HMWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HMWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
HMWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HMWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HMWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VWRP.L	HMWO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	2.50	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	3.44	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.47	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	3.82	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.06	15.06	+2.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRP.L and HMWO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VWRP.L	HMWO.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	2.50	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	0.86	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.72	+0.10

Drawdowns

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, roughly equal to the maximum HMWO.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRP.L and HMWO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWRP.L	HMWO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.10%	-25.48%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-6.71%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-19.01%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.64%	-19.01%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.13%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-4.07%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.71%	+0.04%

Volatility

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) at 2.54%. This indicates that VWRP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWRP.L	HMWO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	2.54%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.68%	7.34%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	10.26%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	13.28%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	14.47%	+0.49%

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than HMWO.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VWRP.L vs. HMWO.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMWO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMWO.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWRP.L and HMWO.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, VWRP.L and HMWO.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, VWRP.L or HMWO.L?

On fees, HMWO.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWRP.L or HMWO.L?

HMWO.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRP.L.

What is the main difference between VWRP.L and HMWO.L?

VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while HMWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRP.L and 0.15% for HMWO.L.