PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRL.L is traded in GBP, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRL.L achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRL.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 12.07%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


VWRL.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.30%
6M
7.10%
YTD
9.83%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
12.07%

WNRG.L

1D
1.10%
1M
3.20%
6M
21.06%
YTD
27.93%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
21.10%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
9.83%13.99%19.60%15.61%-8.44%20.05%12.13%22.04%-4.71%13.21%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.93%6.65%3.85%-1.65%64.04%40.05%-32.40%5.71%-9.95%-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRL.L and WNRG.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.49

The correlation between VWRL.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

WNRG.L
WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRL.LWNRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.23

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

5.81

+5.58

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRL.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.99%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRL.L and WNRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRL.LWNRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.99%

-59.34%

+34.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-16.52%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-21.66%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-22.11%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.99%

-59.34%

+34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-10.03%

+6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-12.66%

+9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

6.35%

-4.51%

Volatility

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) is 3.08%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that VWRL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRL.LWNRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

6.42%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

18.68%

-10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

21.51%

-10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

23.88%

-10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

33.22%

-19.01%

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRL.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.29%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.95%2.00%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRL.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRL.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.

VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for VWRL.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRL.L and WNRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer