PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VWRL.L vs. BATG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VWRL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRL.L returned 12.45%/yr vs 17.37%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWRL.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.

Performance

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRL.L is traded in GBP, while BATG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRL.L achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 34.23% return.

VWRL.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
5.33%
YTD
11.87%
6M
12.31%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
13.48%

BATG.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
34.23%
6M
39.36%
1Y
129.36%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing		11.87%13.99%19.59%15.61%-8.44%20.04%12.13%22.03%-6.68%
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF		34.23%60.42%0.47%2.83%-3.91%17.00%75.38%12.95%-17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRL.L and BATG.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018

0.75

The correlation between VWRL.L and BATG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VWRL.L
BATG.L

Technology

29.0%
17.6%

Financial Services

16.1%

-

Industrials

11.0%
31.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
20.1%

Communication Services

8.8%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%
24.4%

Utilities

2.7%
6.7%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

VWRL.L
29.0%
BATG.L
17.6%

Financial Services

VWRL.L
16.1%
BATG.L

-

Industrials

VWRL.L
11.0%
BATG.L
31.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRL.L
9.4%
BATG.L
20.1%

Communication Services

VWRL.L
8.8%
BATG.L

-

Healthcare

VWRL.L
8.0%
BATG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VWRL.L
5.0%
BATG.L

-

Energy

VWRL.L
4.2%
BATG.L

-

Basic Materials

VWRL.L
3.8%
BATG.L
24.4%

Utilities

VWRL.L
2.7%
BATG.L
6.7%

Real Estate

VWRL.L
1.9%
BATG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing

L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF

Often compared with VWRL.L:
VWRL.L vs. ACWIVWRL.L vs. VHYL.ASVWRL.L vs. VHVG.LVWRL.L vs. VUSA.LVWRL.L vs. VOOVWRL.L vs. VHYG.LVWRL.L vs. VEVE.L
Often compared with BATG.L:
BATG.L vs. DPGT.LBATG.L vs. HIWO.LBATG.L vs. CHRG.LBATG.L vs. WMVG.LBATG.L vs. HTWG.LBATG.L vs. HBGD.TOBATG.L vs. XMWD.L

Return for Risk

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
BATG.L
BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VWRL.LBATG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.88
4.61

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.96
4.96

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.66

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

9.45

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.09

32.41

-15.32

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is lower than the BATG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRL.L and BATG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VWRL.LBATG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

4.61

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.77

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.80

+0.15

Drawdowns

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, smaller than the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRL.L and BATG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VWRL.LBATG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-33.37%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-13.61%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.48%

-33.37%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.48%

-33.37%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.98%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-4.18%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-8.99%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

3.98%

-2.24%

Volatility

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) is 2.97%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that VWRL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VWRL.LBATG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

10.12%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

22.09%

-14.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

27.90%

-17.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

22.54%

-9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

22.86%

-8.61%

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWRL.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while BATG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing		1.24%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.85%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

VWRL.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRL.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.

VWRL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for VWRL.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRL.L and BATG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer