VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L
VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds from Vanguard tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 11.25%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for VWRP.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.22% expense ratio.
Performance
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VWRA.L is traded in USD, while VWRP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VWRA.L having a 11.59% return and VWRP.L slightly higher at 11.65%.
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRP.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.59% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.33% |
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 11.65% | 22.54% | 17.61% | 21.74% | -18.20% | 18.91% | 15.71% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRA.L and VWRP.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VWRA.L and VWRP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Financial Services
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Industrials
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Communication Services
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Consumer Cyclical
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Healthcare
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Consumer Defensive
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Energy
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Basic Materials
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Utilities
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Real Estate
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRA.L
VWRP.L
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRA.L | VWRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.15 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 13.73 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRA.L | VWRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.43 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.80 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRP.L drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and VWRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRA.L | VWRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -33.23% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -9.07% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -16.33% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -26.82% | +0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.78% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -5.40% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.08% | +0.02% |
Volatility
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that VWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRA.L | VWRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.45% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 9.10% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 11.76% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 15.04% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 16.94% | +0.34% |
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VWRA.L and VWRP.L have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRA.L vs. VWRP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRA.L nor VWRP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VWRA.L and VWRP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.22% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRA.L and VWRP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.22% per year.
Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index.
Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and VWRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer