VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L
VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and VUKG.L (Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while VUKG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 11.25%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for VUKG.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWRA.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VUKG.L.
Performance
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VWRA.L is traded in USD, while VUKG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUKG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than VUKG.L's 5.30% return.
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
VUKG.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.59% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.33% |
VUKG.L Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 5.30% | 35.64% | 7.57% | 12.85% | -5.77% | 16.32% | -8.86% | 9.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRA.L and VUKG.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VWRA.L and VUKG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Financial Services
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Industrials
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Communication Services
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Healthcare
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Consumer Defensive
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Energy
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Basic Materials
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Utilities
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Real Estate
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRA.L
VUKG.L
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 2.05 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 6.88 | +6.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.50 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.50 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum VUKG.L drawdown of -42.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and VUKG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -42.13% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -9.68% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -13.79% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -25.65% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -4.57% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -6.05% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.89% | -0.79% |
Volatility
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) is 3.87%, while Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that VWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUKG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRA.L | VUKG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 4.93% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 11.14% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 13.24% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 16.49% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 19.36% | -2.08% |
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VUKG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRA.L vs. VUKG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRA.L nor VUKG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRA.L and VUKG.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUKG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUKG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUKG.L is Europe Equities. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VUKG.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.09% for VUKG.L.
Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and VUKG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer