PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRA.L vs. VDST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than VDST.L's 1.46% return.


VWRA.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.49%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.74%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*

VDST.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
11.59%22.45%17.65%22.28%-18.11%18.46%13.05%
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
1.46%4.26%5.24%4.98%0.95%0.01%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and VDST.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VDST.L
VDST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VDST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VDST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRA.LVDST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-18.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

4.88

-3.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

36.06

-32.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

244.57

-230.94

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the VDST.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and VDST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRA.LVDST.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

9.31

-7.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

8.05

-7.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

7.83

-7.05

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, which is greater than VDST.L's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and VDST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRA.LVDST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-0.36%

-33.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-0.11%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-0.15%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

-0.36%

-25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-0.03%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

0.02%

+2.08%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) at 0.12%. This indicates that VWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRA.LVDST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

0.12%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

0.33%

+9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

0.42%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

0.47%

+14.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

0.46%

+16.82%

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VDST.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRA.L vs. VDST.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VWRA.L nor VDST.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRA.L and VDST.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDST.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDST.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VDST.L is Government Bonds. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VDST.L tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.05% for VDST.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and VDST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer