VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SPXS.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VWRA.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while SPXS.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 11.04%/yr vs -54.94%/yr for SPXS.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VWRA.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXS.L.

Performance

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS.L's 10.20% return.

VWRA.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 9.58%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 1Y: 23.59%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: 11.04%
• 10Y*: —

SPXS.L

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.05%
• 6M: 9.96%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 1Y: -98.78%
• 3Y*: -74.11%
• 5Y*: -54.94%
• 10Y*: -27.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	11.15%	22.45%	17.65%	22.28%	-18.11%	18.46%	16.19%	7.42%
SPXS.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.20%	-98.82%	25.56%	27.00%	-18.53%	29.64%	17.89%	9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and SPXS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019	0.95

The correlation between VWRA.L and SPXS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L

VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SPXS.L

SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWRA.L	SPXS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	-0.99	+2.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	-0.78	+3.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.52	+0.82
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	-1.00	+3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.67	-1.23	+11.89

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and SPXS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWRA.L	SPXS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-99.07%	+65.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-99.07%	+90.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.26%	-99.07%	+82.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-99.07%	+73.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-98.90%	+97.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-7.67%	+2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	80.57%	-78.36%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that VWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWRA.L	SPXS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	2.73%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.60%	9.24%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	99.43%	-86.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	47.13%	-31.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.19%	35.27%	-18.08%

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VWRA.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VWRA.L nor SPXS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWRA.L and SPXS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, VWRA.L and SPXS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, VWRA.L or SPXS.L?

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWRA.L or SPXS.L?

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

What is the main difference between VWRA.L and SPXS.L?

VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.