PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRA.L is traded in USD, while LSMC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LSMC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 59.97% return.


VWRA.L

1D
2.32%
1M
0.88%
YTD
10.21%
6M
11.90%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*

LSMC.DE

1D
4.03%
1M
5.70%
YTD
59.97%
6M
65.80%
1Y
120.76%
3Y*
62.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
10.21%22.45%17.65%22.28%-18.11%1.22%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
59.97%49.69%56.99%80.04%-38.27%-1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and LSMC.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.74

The correlation between VWRA.L and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRA.LLSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.53

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

8.21

-5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

28.02

-16.14

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -47.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRA.LLSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-47.95%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-14.63%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-32.83%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-4.40%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-12.82%

+7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

4.29%

-2.13%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) is 4.38%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 12.32%. This indicates that VWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRA.LLSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

12.32%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

24.51%

-14.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

31.71%

-18.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

33.63%

-18.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

33.63%

-16.38%

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRA.L vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VWRA.L nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRA.L and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRA.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer