VWRA.L vs. IUES.L
VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 11.25%/yr vs 20.33%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWRA.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.45% return.
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.59% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.33% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.45% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRA.L and IUES.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.40 |
The correlation between VWRA.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRA.L
IUES.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
VWRA.L
IUES.L
Basic Materials
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Utilities
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
VWRA.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRA.L
IUES.L
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRA.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.18 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 9.97 | +3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRA.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.12 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.76 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.31 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRA.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -66.78% | +33.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -14.49% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -20.90% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -27.98% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -7.45% | +6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -14.21% | +8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 4.63% | -2.53% |
Volatility
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) is 3.87%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that VWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRA.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 8.13% | -4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 18.58% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.36% | 21.81% | -9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 26.72% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 28.49% | -11.21% |
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRA.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRA.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRA.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer