PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than IBTU.L's 1.56% return.


VWRA.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*

IBTU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
9.53%22.45%17.65%22.28%-18.11%18.46%16.19%7.42%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.56%4.33%5.31%4.92%1.05%0.10%0.88%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and IBTU.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRA.LIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

3.47

-2.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

19.33

-16.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.28

83.96

-72.68

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -0.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRA.LIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-0.72%

-32.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-0.20%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-0.20%

-16.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

-0.40%

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

0.00%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-0.06%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.05%

+2.12%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 0.28%. This indicates that VWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRA.LIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

0.28%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

0.82%

+9.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

1.15%

+11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

1.02%

+14.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

0.95%

+16.28%

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTU.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRA.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.06%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRA.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IBTU.L is Government Bonds. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.07% for IBTU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer