PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWOB vs. EMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWOB vs. EMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWOB achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than EMBX's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VWOB has underperformed EMBX with an annualized return of 3.53%, while EMBX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.07% annualized return.


VWOB

1D
0.24%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.96%
1Y
10.67%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
3.53%

EMBX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.81%
YTD
3.74%
6M
4.04%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWOB vs. EMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
1.79%13.49%5.20%10.68%-17.39%-1.80%5.65%14.46%-2.92%8.41%
EMBX
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
3.74%18.80%3.09%9.34%-7.21%-4.30%11.57%13.10%-6.21%11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VWOB and EMBX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.56

The correlation between VWOB and EMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (10 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWOB vs. EMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWOB
VWOB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VWOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWOB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VWOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWOB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EMBX
EMBX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWOB vs. EMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOBEMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.94

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

12.46

-2.34

VWOB vs. EMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWOB Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the EMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWOB and EMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOBEMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.64

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.65

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.76

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Drawdowns

VWOB vs. EMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWOB drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, which is greater than EMBX's maximum drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWOB and EMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOBEMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-25.11%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-5.14%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

-7.41%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-24.07%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

-25.11%

-1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.38%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-7.08%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.21%

-0.15%

Volatility

VWOB vs. EMBX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) and VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) have volatilities of 1.69% and 1.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOBEMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.72%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

4.77%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

5.73%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.18%

6.10%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.34%

6.65%

+2.69%

VWOB vs. EMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWOB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWOB vs. EMBX - Dividend Comparison

VWOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than EMBX's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMBX
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.90%6.95%8.20%5.49%8.21%5.50%6.56%7.89%7.25%7.66%3.94%6.84%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
5.83%5.92%6.08%5.50%5.30%4.04%4.18%4.58%4.52%4.61%4.71%4.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWOB and EMBX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMBX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to VWOB (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWOB dropped -26.98% vs EMBX's -25.11%.

On 10-year performance, EMBX leads with 5.07% vs 3.53% for VWOB. On fees, VWOB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMBX has performed better with a 5.07% return vs 3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWOB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for EMBX.

EMBX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 5.83% for VWOB.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VWOB and 0.76% for EMBX.

EMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWOB and EMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer