PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWNFX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWNFX achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 31.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VWNFX having a 12.78% annualized return and YAFFX not far ahead at 12.94%.


VWNFX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.98%
YTD
7.23%
6M
9.20%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.78%

YAFFX

1D
3.61%
1M
10.56%
YTD
31.39%
6M
15.83%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWNFX
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares
7.23%18.51%13.91%21.01%-13.26%28.84%14.41%29.02%-8.62%15.61%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
31.39%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VWNFX and YAFFX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1997

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between VWNFX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWNFX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWNFX
VWNFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VWNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VWNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWNFXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.38

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

1.51

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.76

+1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.96

6.40

+6.56

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWNFX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWNFXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.38

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.58

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.79

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.62

+0.01

Drawdowns

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWNFX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWNFX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWNFXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.57%

-43.80%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-17.08%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

-18.88%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-21.31%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.44%

-30.62%

-6.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-6.21%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

4.70%

-2.78%

Volatility

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) is 2.32%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that VWNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWNFXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

6.09%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

22.30%

-14.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

22.23%

-11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.09%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

16.53%

+2.08%

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWNFX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWNFX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

VWNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VWNFX
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares
10.68%11.46%10.50%5.11%7.26%7.83%7.31%10.06%11.38%7.34%8.08%7.96%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWNFX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to VWNFX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWNFX dropped -57.57% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

VWNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWNFX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer