PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWNFX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, VWNFX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 12.78%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


VWNFX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.98%
YTD
7.23%
6M
9.20%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.78%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWNFX
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares
7.23%18.51%13.91%21.01%-13.26%28.84%14.41%29.02%-8.62%15.61%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VWNFX and FALIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between VWNFX and FALIX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWNFX
FALIX

Technology

20.5%
25.2%

Financial Services

19.2%
15.6%

Healthcare

12.2%
10.5%

Industrials

10.1%
18.9%

Communication Services

8.1%
9.9%

Energy

7.0%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.3%

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.3%

Utilities

2.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.7%

Technology

VWNFX
20.5%
FALIX
25.2%

Financial Services

VWNFX
19.2%
FALIX
15.6%

Healthcare

VWNFX
12.2%
FALIX
10.5%

Industrials

VWNFX
10.1%
FALIX
18.9%

Communication Services

VWNFX
8.1%
FALIX
9.9%

Energy

VWNFX
7.0%
FALIX
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VWNFX
6.9%
FALIX
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

VWNFX
4.8%
FALIX
4.3%

Basic Materials

VWNFX
4.7%
FALIX
2.3%

Utilities

VWNFX
2.2%
FALIX
1.1%

Real Estate

VWNFX
0.5%
FALIX
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWNFX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWNFX
VWNFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VWNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VWNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWNFXFALIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.91

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

2.67

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.51

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

6.07

-2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.96

11.02

+1.93

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWNFX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWNFXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.91

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.77

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.77

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Drawdowns

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWNFX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, smaller than the maximum FALIX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWNFX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWNFXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.57%

-62.37%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-5.03%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

-18.89%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-21.48%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.44%

-37.51%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.17%

+4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-13.28%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.77%

-0.85%

Volatility

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that VWNFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWNFXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

0.00%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

4.22%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

8.08%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.44%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

18.58%

+0.03%

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWNFX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWNFX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

VWNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
VWNFX
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares
10.68%11.46%10.50%5.11%7.26%7.83%7.31%10.06%11.38%7.34%8.08%7.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWNFX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWNFX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWNFX dropped -57.57% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

VWNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWNFX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer