VVPLX vs. RCKSX
VVPLX (Vulcan Value Partners Fund) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VVPLX returned 9.05%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for RCKSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VVPLX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.
Performance
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVPLX achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VVPLX has underperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.
VVPLX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -9.56%
- 6M
- -9.92%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
RCKSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 15.47%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVPLX Vulcan Value Partners Fund | -9.56% | 7.48% | 17.50% | 41.77% | -38.08% | 21.61% | 11.60% | 44.43% | -7.83% | 16.74% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 15.47% | 12.99% | 15.12% | 15.57% | -18.09% | 9.96% | 13.75% | 19.05% | -2.14% | 22.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVPLX and RCKSX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2009 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VVPLX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVPLX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank
VVPLX
RCKSX
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vulcan Value Partners Fund (VVPLX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVPLX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.31 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 5.35 | -5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 14.75 | -15.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVPLX drawdown since its inception was -47.95%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVPLX and RCKSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVPLX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.95% | -57.88% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.19% | -4.14% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.19% | -18.22% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.95% | -22.54% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.95% | -33.10% | -14.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.09% | -0.46% | -12.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -9.48% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.34% | 1.50% | +6.84% |
Volatility
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison
Vulcan Value Partners Fund (VVPLX) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.29%. This indicates that VVPLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVPLX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 3.29% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 8.07% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 11.75% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 15.64% | +7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 17.55% | +4.70% |
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVPLX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVPLX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison
VVPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than RCKSX's 5.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 5.42% | 6.26% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 4.31% | 16.56% | 3.18% | 0.59% | 5.91% | 0.70% | 3.21% |
VVPLX Vulcan Value Partners Fund | 6.47% | 5.85% | 0.19% | 0.05% | 5.95% | 11.33% | 3.54% | 4.37% | 8.90% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVPLX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VVPLX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to RCKSX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVPLX dropped -47.95% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.
RCKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VVPLX and RCKSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer