VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and XGSD.L (Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - VVMX.DE is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while XGSD.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VVMX.DE returned 3.35%/yr vs 19.16%/yr for XGSD.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVMX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XGSD.L.

Performance

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VVMX.DE is traded in EUR, while XGSD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGSD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVMX.DE achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly higher than XGSD.L's 15.18% return.

VVMX.DE

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -9.18%
• YTD: 30.24%
• 6M: 37.51%
• 1Y: 146.32%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XGSD.L

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 15.18%
• 6M: 16.79%
• 1Y: 31.08%
• 3Y*: 19.16%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	30.24%	68.45%	-30.81%	-21.17%	-26.46%	16.96%
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D	15.18%	18.96%	14.36%	5.00%	-1.10%	7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VVMX.DE and XGSD.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021	0.50

The correlation between VVMX.DE and XGSD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVMX.DE

VVMX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 87
VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
VVMX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
VVMX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
VVMX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VVMX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

XGSD.L

XGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
XGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VVMX.DE	XGSD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	3.46	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	4.86	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.64	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.59	8.13	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.66	29.12	-9.46

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is comparable to the XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVMX.DE and XGSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XGSD.L drawdown of -70.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and XGSD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VVMX.DE	XGSD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.26%	-70.20%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.40%	-3.80%	-16.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.55%	-13.74%	-47.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.51%	0.00%	-25.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.19%	-15.56%	-25.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.89%	1.06%	+6.83%

Volatility

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.59% compared to Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) at 2.29%. This indicates that VVMX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VVMX.DE	XGSD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.59%	2.29%	+10.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.22%	6.60%	+25.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.13%	8.97%	+37.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.36%	12.02%	+24.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.36%	14.74%	+21.62%

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XGSD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

VVMX.DE vs. XGSD.L - Dividend Comparison

VVMX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D	4.11%	4.60%	6.38%	7.51%	8.71%	4.76%	5.34%	4.30%	4.68%	3.56%	2.74%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VVMX.DE and XGSD.L in my portfolio?

VVMX.DE and XGSD.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VVMX.DE or XGSD.L?

On fees, XGSD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VVMX.DE or XGSD.L?

XGSD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.

What is the main difference between VVMX.DE and XGSD.L?

VVMX.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while XGSD.L is Global Equity Income. VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.50% for XGSD.L.