VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE
VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and XDWU.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - VVMX.DE is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while XDWU.DE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VVMX.DE returned 2.20%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for XDWU.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVMX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWU.DE.
Performance
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVMX.DE achieves a 21.99% return, which is significantly higher than XDWU.DE's 13.17% return.
VVMX.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 21.99%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 124.83%
- 3Y*
- 2.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWU.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 21.99% | 68.45% | -30.81% | -21.17% | -26.46% | 16.96% |
XDWU.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 13.17% | 11.38% | 19.84% | -3.21% | 2.24% | 13.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVMX.DE and XDWU.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VVMX.DE
XDWU.DE
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVMX.DE | XDWU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | 3.08 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.48 | 7.76 | +6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than XDWU.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and XDWU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVMX.DE | XDWU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.26% | -42.00% | -31.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.68% | -7.30% | -13.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.20% | -12.69% | -48.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.23% | -0.87% | -29.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.03% | -12.47% | -28.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.66% | 2.91% | +5.75% |
Volatility
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) at 4.13%. This indicates that VVMX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVMX.DE | XDWU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.77% | 4.13% | +8.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 10.75% | +22.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.34% | 12.95% | +34.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 14.25% | +22.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 18.00% | +18.44% |
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWU.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVMX.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VVMX.DE nor XDWU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VVMX.DE and XDWU.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWU.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWU.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
VVMX.DE is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while XDWU.DE is Utilities Equities. VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while XDWU.DE tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.25% for XDWU.DE.
Find the right allocation for VVMX.DE and XDWU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer