VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE
VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VVMX.DE is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VVMX.DE returned 155.75% vs 59.20% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVMX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVMX.DE achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 33.86% return.
VVMX.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 6M
- 39.84%
- 1Y
- 155.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 59.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 30.24% | 95.49% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 33.86% | 14.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVMX.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VVMX.DE
QUTM.DE
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VVMX.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.59 | 2.48 | +5.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.66 | 5.81 | +13.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VVMX.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36 | 1.95 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 1.71 | -1.69 |
Drawdowns
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVMX.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.26% | -23.74% | -49.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.40% | -23.74% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.51% | -3.42% | -22.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.23% | -7.71% | -33.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.89% | 10.15% | -2.26% |
Volatility
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) have volatilities of 12.59% and 12.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVMX.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.59% | 12.36% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.22% | 20.92% | +11.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.13% | 30.14% | +15.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 30.16% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 30.16% | +6.22% |
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVMX.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VVMX.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VVMX.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUTM.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUTM.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
VVMX.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for VVMX.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer