VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L
VVMX.DE (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and FLRK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VVMX.DE is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while FLRK.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VVMX.DE returned 3.35%/yr vs 43.90%/yr for FLRK.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVMX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLRK.L.
Performance
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VVMX.DE is traded in EUR, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVMX.DE achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 109.60% return.
VVMX.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 6M
- 37.51%
- 1Y
- 146.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLRK.L
- 1D
- 5.46%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 109.60%
- 6M
- 126.82%
- 1Y
- 207.20%
- 3Y*
- 43.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- —
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVMX.DE VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 30.24% | 68.45% | -30.81% | -21.17% | -26.46% | 16.96% |
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 109.60% | 72.62% | -16.72% | 16.57% | -23.52% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVMX.DE and FLRK.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank
VVMX.DE
FLRK.L
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVMX.DE | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.72 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.59 | 9.83 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.66 | 33.81 | -14.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than FLRK.L's maximum drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and FLRK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVMX.DE | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.26% | -40.28% | -32.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.40% | -20.93% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.55% | -34.91% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.51% | -7.30% | -18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -17.27% | -23.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.89% | 6.10% | +1.79% |
Volatility
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) is 12.59%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 17.41%. This indicates that VVMX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVMX.DE | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.59% | 17.41% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.22% | 35.10% | -2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.13% | 39.48% | +6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.36% | 29.95% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.36% | 30.69% | +5.67% |
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVMX.DE vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VVMX.DE nor FLRK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VVMX.DE and FLRK.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.
VVMX.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while FLRK.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.09% for FLRK.L.
Find the right allocation for VVMX.DE and FLRK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer