VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX
VVLU.AX (Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF) and IKO.AX (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU)) are both Global Equities funds. VVLU.AX is actively managed, while IKO.AX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VVLU.AX returned 13.88%/yr vs 16.67%/yr for IKO.AX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVLU.AX achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than IKO.AX's 64.31% return.
VVLU.AX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IKO.AX
- 1D
- -7.36%
- 1M
- -17.70%
- 6M
- 49.12%
- YTD
- 64.31%
- 1Y
- 119.84%
- 3Y*
- 37.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVLU.AX Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF | 8.83% | 18.04% | 15.87% | 18.15% | 0.35% | 37.99% | -11.29% | 22.31% | -14.12% |
IKO.AX iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) | 64.31% | 80.87% | -12.63% | 16.96% | -20.13% | -2.25% | 29.64% | 7.29% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVLU.AX and IKO.AX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2018 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VVLU.AX and IKO.AX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX — Risk / Return Rank
VVLU.AX
IKO.AX
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF (VVLU.AX) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVLU.AX | IKO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 5.18 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 15.73 | -7.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVLU.AX drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, smaller than the maximum IKO.AX drawdown of -57.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVLU.AX and IKO.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVLU.AX | IKO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.95% | -57.74% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -22.15% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -22.15% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.80% | -39.03% | +24.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -22.11% | +21.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -17.29% | +11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 7.43% | -4.64% |
Volatility
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF (VVLU.AX) is 3.57%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) (IKO.AX) has a volatility of 21.99%. This indicates that VVLU.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IKO.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVLU.AX | IKO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 21.99% | -18.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 42.47% | -31.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 45.53% | -31.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 27.00% | -12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 23.38% | -5.42% |
Dividends
VVLU.AX vs. IKO.AX - Dividend Comparison
VVLU.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, more than IKO.AX's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IKO.AX iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (AU) | 5.85% | 0.93% | 3.03% | 1.08% | 1.86% | 0.87% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 1.07% |
VVLU.AX Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF | 10.99% | 7.07% | 3.21% | 5.22% | 2.63% | 1.36% | 2.21% | 2.31% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVLU.AX and IKO.AX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.
Find the right allocation for VVLU.AX and IKO.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer