PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged (VXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VVL.TO having a 10.59% return and VXM.TO slightly lower at 10.12%.


VVL.TO

1D
-0.67%
1M
3.38%
YTD
10.59%
6M
10.52%
1Y
33.99%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*

VXM.TO

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.10%
YTD
10.12%
6M
14.12%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
29.48%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
10.59%21.53%14.96%16.51%0.45%29.74%-3.32%13.38%-9.42%12.32%
VXM.TO
CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged
10.12%44.77%19.29%24.09%3.19%19.09%-13.99%16.55%-15.76%24.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VVL.TO and VXM.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2016

0.43

The correlation between VVL.TO and VXM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (5 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VVL.TO
VXM.TO

Financial Services

25.3%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
16.8%

Healthcare

10.8%
2.0%

Technology

10.5%
3.8%

Industrials

9.8%
25.0%

Energy

9.4%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

6.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.0%
7.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Utilities

0.0%
10.5%

Financial Services

VVL.TO
25.3%
VXM.TO
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VVL.TO
14.8%
VXM.TO
16.8%

Healthcare

VVL.TO
10.8%
VXM.TO
2.0%

Technology

VVL.TO
10.5%
VXM.TO
3.8%

Industrials

VVL.TO
9.8%
VXM.TO
25.0%

Energy

VVL.TO
9.4%
VXM.TO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

VVL.TO
6.5%
VXM.TO
6.5%

Communication Services

VVL.TO
6.1%
VXM.TO
3.5%

Basic Materials

VVL.TO
6.0%
VXM.TO
7.1%

Real Estate

VVL.TO
0.9%
VXM.TO
1.0%

Utilities

VVL.TO
0.0%
VXM.TO
10.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVL.TO
VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VXM.TO
VXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged (VXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVL.TOVXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.54

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.93

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

14.50

+0.85

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVL.TO and VXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVL.TOVXM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.85

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.33

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Drawdowns

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VXM.TO drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and VXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVL.TOVXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.93%

-42.73%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-9.40%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.10%

-13.71%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-14.47%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-3.49%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-7.51%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.54%

-0.32%

Volatility

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) is 3.17%, while CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged (VXM.TO) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that VVL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVL.TOVXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

5.92%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

11.01%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

12.99%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

14.82%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

16.97%

+1.77%

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVL.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than VXM.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVL.TO vs. VXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than VXM.TO's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
1.71%1.89%2.19%2.65%2.52%1.48%1.67%2.60%2.11%1.33%0.59%0.00%
VXM.TO
CI Morningstar International Value CAD Hedged
2.14%2.03%3.60%3.37%3.54%2.08%2.27%1.56%2.07%1.51%1.85%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVL.TO and VXM.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for VXM.TO.

VVL.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while VXM.TO is International Equity. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and CI Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VVL.TO and 0.66% for VXM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVL.TO and VXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer