PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVGM.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than XG12.DE's 39.92% return.


VVGM.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*

XG12.DE

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.41%
YTD
39.92%
6M
37.25%
1Y
53.56%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VVGM.DE
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.57%11.67%16.13%7.09%-4.39%
XG12.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C
39.92%8.69%-4.44%-8.34%-5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VVGM.DE and XG12.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022

0.68

The correlation between VVGM.DE and XG12.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVGM.DE
VVGM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVGM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XG12.DE
XG12.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XG12.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVGM.DEXG12.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.59

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

7.95

-7.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

25.46

-23.30

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVGM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the XG12.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVGM.DE and XG12.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVGM.DEXG12.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

3.33

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.39

+0.32

Drawdowns

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum XG12.DE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVGM.DE and XG12.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVGM.DEXG12.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-32.01%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-6.77%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-24.98%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-1.67%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-14.28%

+10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.12%

+1.34%

Volatility

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) is 4.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that VVGM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG12.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVGM.DEXG12.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

6.86%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

12.62%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

16.18%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

17.44%

-3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

17.44%

-3.72%

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVGM.DE has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XG12.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVGM.DE vs. XG12.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VVGM.DE nor XG12.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VVGM.DE and XG12.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XG12.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XG12.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for VVGM.DE.

VVGM.DE tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus, while XG12.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production Select. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for VVGM.DE and 0.35% for XG12.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVGM.DE and XG12.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer